Methodology, architecture, and fair competitive comparisons. Written by the team that built Aewita.
How we arrived at the under-0.3% claim, what it does and doesn't mean, and a playbook any firm or competitor can audit against.
Model Context Protocol, explained for legal tech. Why it changes the DMS question and what to look for in an MCP implementation.
Harvey runs on OpenAI. Aewita runs its own model. What that actually means for Rule 1.6 — and where Harvey is stronger.
CoCounsel is an AI layer on Westlaw wrapping OpenAI and Anthropic. Two organizational boundaries per query. A walk through what changes when one vendor owns the stack.
Legora is EU-first. Aewita is U.S.-first. Where each fits — and why the answer is simpler than you'd expect.
Seven platforms, four criteria, honest scoring. Harvey, CoCounsel, Westlaw AI, Lexis+ AI, Legora, MidPage, and Aewita.
Harvey is built for AmLaw 100. Mid-sized firms need something they can start using this week, at a price that doesn't need committee approval.
A practical compliance checklist for Rules 1.1, 1.6, and 5.3. What to ask your AI vendor — and what their non-answer means.
The 2023 sanctions should have ended fabricated citations in legal briefs. They didn't. Why — and what verification actually means.
The SharePoint-folder-of-templates is dead. Modern firms need searchable, insertable, version-controlled approved language — firm-wide.
Chat-based AI is wrong for due diligence. You need a structured matrix, not a conversation. How that changes everything.
Your client list walks out the door. Your best partner's brain used to do the same. Not anymore.
Most legal AI is priced for AmLaw 200. Solos and small firms got left out. Not anymore — what to look for, what to skip.
A ten-question framework. Any vendor who can't answer every one is not ready for your firm.
Three good tools. One of them doesn't send your work to someone else's AI. A fair side-by-side.
14 days free. Real access to the real Aewita.